Is this treason
Why Is This Not Treason?...by Paul Weston
Posted by Baron Bodissey gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/ at 20/05/2011
A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.
An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor
moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the
very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to
his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the
hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine
the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less
to fear. The traitor is the plague. — Cicero
On the 3rd of January 1946, William Joyce, better known as Lord Haw-Haw,
was the last man in Britain to be hanged for the ancient crime of treason. He of course sided with the Nazis
during the hot war of 1939-1945. The recent Labour government might not have been operating in a hot-war
theatre, but they certainly carried out a warm-war against the British (principally the English) via mass
immigration from one of the most hostile and anti-Western countries in the world, Pakistan.
Consider some of the following statistics:
* Only nineteen percent of Pakistanis have a negative view of Al Qaeda and by default the Taliban, whilst
seventy-five percent wish to see Sharia law implemented. British-born Muslims make an estimated four
hundred thousand trips a year to Pakistan, where as many as thirty threats against Britain are being
monitored at any given time.
* Thirty-three percent of Muslim students in Britain think killing in the name of Islam is permissible.
Only thirty-seven percent oppose the introduction of Sharia law and only twenty-five percent oppose the
creation of a worldwide Muslim caliphate.
* MI5 believe there are up to four thousand potential terrorists and thirteen thousand Al Qaeda sympathisers
living in Britain. The CIA devotes an astonishing forty percent of their anti-terrorist homeland security
operations against suspects not in Afghanistan or Waziristan, but in Britain itself — a country described
by one CIA operative as “a swamp of Jihadis.”
* Barack Obama’s counter-terrorist advisor Bruce Riedel recently stated: “The British Pakistani
community is recognised as probably Al Qaeda’s best mechanism for launching an attack against North
America.”
All in all then, it would seem less than prudent to allow any more bearded ideologues into Britain, yet the
Labour government — and this must sound quite insane to most people — actually went to the extraordinary
lengths of advertising for foreign colonisers from the very same country the Home Office was paying Danegeld
to go, in a typically limp-wristed appeal to stop it from blowing us up.
The British Embassy in Pakistan distributed glossy pamphlets entitled “Multicultural Britain — a Land of
Immigrants” which gave a raft of arguments as to the benefits of living in Britain such as well paid jobs,
plain old welfare, and the prospect of inviting over the entire extended family (sans goat) once a British
passport had been acquired.
And of course there was the rather unpleasant — nay, treacherous — implication that there was no such thing
as a homogenous Britain, no such place as an English homeland, just an indeterminate area of land settled by
a vague mongrel collection of disparate peoples including any number of rag-tag colonial racists awaiting divine
racial redemption from those they once oppressed. See Imperial Britain was a Blessing.
Read more...
HERE