Talk about a U-Turn Mr small 'c' cameron!
Now, in a complete about turn, he's practically bragging about the fact he WANTS homosexuality to be promoted, and launches another round of contention with a policy to welcome all gays to Britain who are "refugees fleeing homophobic persecution".

He says; "If you are fleeing persecution and that fear is well-founded, then you should be able to stay. As I understand it, the 1951 Convention [on the rights of refugees] doesn't mention sexuality, but because it mentions membership of a social group, that phrase is being used by the courts, rightly, to say that if someone has a realistic fear of persecution they should be allowed to stay.", and further, that he would want to reverse the ban on gay men giving blood, saying; "It sounds perfectly logical and sensible to make the change... Logic would dictate that it's time to change."

Who is he speaking for?
His "logic" hasn't much if anything to do with the state involving itself in the 'promotion' of an abnormal activity, instead it's the vain hope of gaining votes from the gay community or alternatively acting in a completely unprincipled way to indoctrinate children with HIS views for the sake of votes. HIS craving for POWER, above a simple love for our country and its people. i.e. He doesn't want to serve, he wants to CONTROL.

I don't see any reason to set out my own views on this issue but I CAN offer an opinion that I feel the state has no business intruding into the heads of children in this way, nor has it any business in deciding who gives blood.

Where is there freedom of choice in this country when a politician who is completely without any experience of government, bereft of knowledge of wider society, carries less than a majority of polling results, is supposed to serve the national view, and is without a scrap of legal or medical knowledge, gets off like another dictating son of a bitch Brown?

But that's not all
He speaks about refugees being given safe haven under HIS interpretation of international law, yet he fails to honour the terms of that same law in regard to refugee status. i.e. That a refugee has automatic refuge in the 'nearest country' from that which they flee under 'persecution', and not half way across the world to the last refuge of Britain because it happens to have a plonker in government who thinks it's great to be gay.

The only places on earth of course which would 'persecute' gays, would be Islamic countries. So my question is why he fails to give this information when making calls for Britain to become the safe haven for Muslim Gays?
Full article... HERE

Return to index